How closely each judge's marks track the official results, from eepro.com scoresheets.
Every point of disagreement counts the same — one wild mark and ten small ones matter equally.
Forgiving of one freak mark; a judge who's mostly close but occasionally way off still scores well.
Punishes wild outlier marks hardest — a single way-off placement can dominate the score.
Lower = closer to the official outcome. Score is the weighted average deviation, normalized so different field sizes compare fairly.
Click a bar to see that judge's individual marks.
Each dot is one mark: how far it landed from the official result (0 = exact agreement, 1 = maximal disagreement). Hover a dot for the competitor.
| Judge | Score | Marks | Finals marks | Prelims marks | Worst deviation |
|---|
Use this responsibly. Judges mark whole fields in seconds, panels are small, and a handful of marks is statistical noise — a judge who "marked you down" at one event may simply have seen a different 20 seconds of your dancing. This view is for satisfying curiosity, not for holding grudges, lobbying judges, or deciding whom to dance in front of. If you find yourself checking it before every comp, close the map.
Pick a year and type a competitor's name to see which judges' marks were most and least favorable to them, relative to official results — aggregated across every event they entered that year. First search of a year fetches every event's scoresheets, so it can take a while.